Category: Criminal justice

How do you decide if an evacuation of the area immediately surrounding the train derailment is necessary? How would you facilitate an evacuation?How do you deal with volunteers from neighboring communities? How do you differentiate a volunteer from a looter?

Dealing with emergencies

How do you triage this situation? What is your priority? What organizations do you know you must immediately contact?

How do you discern the danger and magnitude of the chemical spill? What precautions must personnel take as they approach the scene? What organization do you turn to for help?

How do you decide if an evacuation of the area immediately surrounding the train derailment is necessary? How would you facilitate an evacuation?

What response do you give to the media?

What resources do you request from neighboring communities? From the state?

How do you deal with volunteers from neighboring communities? How do you differentiate a volunteer from a looter?

When you have completed the assignment, save your document and then submit a copy to your instructor Brightspace. The document should be a Word document (*.doc or docx), a PDF or RTF file.

Choose ONE of the three key sociological perspectives discussed in weeks 2-4 to explain the phenomenon. In your answer, you will need to demonstrate an understanding of the nature and extent of the ‘problem’ before applying your chosen sociological theory.

Understanding Social Problems

Choose ONE of the following three social problems: environmental problems, conflict, war and terrorism or gender, sexuality, and inequality.

Choose ONE of the three key sociological perspectives discussed in weeks 2-4 to explain the phenomenon. In your answer, you will need to demonstrate an understanding of the nature and extent of the ‘problem’ before applying your chosen sociological theory.

More information and guidance on this assessment item will be found on the Learning@Griffith course website and in the marking criteria sheet.

The collaborate sessions held during the study period will be an important resource for students to use when completing this assessment.

How do the impact of political, economic, cultural and social effects on the development of the United States Constitutional Law System.

Discuss and evaluate the question assigned to you, and  explain the main points, key concepts, and included assumptions/conclusions based on cited references. 100 points.

How do the impact of political, economic, cultural and social effects on the development of the United States Constitutional Law System.

How would you compare the relationship of the LGBT community during the Stonewall era with the relationship of today?Can you draw any parallels between the Stonewall Riots as a movement and the protests that are occurring today?

Stonewall

What were the Stonewall Riots?

What did Claire Potter mean that “the police did not get their payoff”?

Can you draw any parallels between the Stonewall Riots as a movement and the protests that are
occurring today?

How is the Stonewall Riots a marker for the Gay Rights period?

What were the challenges of “coming out”?

What is the significance of the Stonewall Inn today?

What is outhistory.org?

Consider the arc of gay history over the last fifty years. List two changes that Claire Potter mentioned
about that arc of history.

How would you compare the relationship of the LGBT community during the Stonewall era with the
relationship of today?

What is the main argument or point of the article, chapter or reading selection? What did the author(s) want to get across in the reading?Identify two words and their definition that you were unfamiliar with prior to reading the article, chapter or reading selection.

What is the general topic of the article, chapter or reading selection?

Summarize the article, chapter or reading selection:

What is the main argument or point of the article, chapter or reading selection? What did the author(s) want to get across in the reading?

Discuss at least one main point or part of the article, chapter or reading selection that supports their argument.

Identify two words and their definition that you were unfamiliar with prior to reading the article, chapter or reading selection.

What advantages do you see in the use of a collaborative model in criminal sanctioning, as seen with problem-solving courts? Is it beneficial to have court staff, including prosecutors and defense attorneys, working together to arrive at an appropriate sanction for the offender? Any possible problems? How would you like to be involved in this sort of collaborative court process?

What advantages do you see in the use of a collaborative model in criminal sanctioning, as seen with problem-solving courts? Is it beneficial to have court staff, including prosecutors and defense attorneys, working together to arrive at an appropriate sanction for the offender? Any possible problems? How would you like to be involved in this sort of collaborative court process?

IN YOUR OWN WORDS< YOUR OWN OPINION

Discuss various ethical approaches for studying the issue you have chosen.Identify the main argument of the articles you have identified.

Using the Miller Library, find at least four peer-reviewed articles in academic journals on a specific ethical issue in the criminal justice system of your choice.

The criminal justice issue you choose might be a component of current political, criminal issues, or historical issues.

4. Read your articles, analyzing the issue you have chosen through the lens of an ethical theory.

5. Write an essay of 1,500-2,000 words which critically reviews the articles, discusses the issue, and addresses the following:

Describe your topic fully.

Discuss various ethical approaches for studying the issue you have chosen.

Identify the main argument of the articles you have identified.

Describe the theoretical framework that is utilized to discuss the issue.

Discuss what logical argument is being presented in the articles

What do you believe to be the benefits of acknowledging the strengths of the person, rather than simply focusing on their deficits or negatives? Would a strength-based approach compromise the position of probation in assuring the compliance with probation requirements? Explain. Which approach do you believe would work better if you were the subject of the approach? Why?

What do you believe to be the benefits of acknowledging the strengths of the person, rather than simply focusing on their deficits or negatives? Would a strength-based approach compromise the position of probation in assuring the compliance with probation requirements? Explain. Which approach do you believe would work better if you were the subject of the approach? Why? (Based on Packet # 6 and 7 above)

The packet is uploaded its pages 3-9.

Read the packet answer the question in your own words. No outside sources.