Compare how two different works from Module 3 portray the struggle for freedom. What are characters fighting for and against? What argument does each text seem to be making about this concept use specific evidence from both works to support your answer.
Category: ENGLISH
Discuss the ways in which this progression is changing the landscape of our society as we are increasingly reliant on our devices and what we are offered through our online immersion.
Discuss the ways in which this progression is changing the landscape of our society as we are increasingly reliant on our devices and what we are offered through our online immersion.
Explain how this draft is organized. How does this contribute to or detract from the effectiveness of the document?
Workshop response
Your entire response (for all eight questions, in total) should be at least 450 words long.
What is your partner’s name?
Restate this rough draft’s main point in your own words. If the main point is difficult to identify, explain. Is it clear? Appropriate for its audience?
Discuss one way the writer of this draft effectively adapts technical material for a non-technical audience.
Explain how this draft is organized. How does this contribute to or detract from the effectiveness of the document?
Identify any elements that need more development OR that feel extraneous and should be dropped. Explain. If this seems not to apply, explain why not.
What is this draft’s greatest strength? Explain.
What element here needs the most work? Explain.
Anything else?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/release-notes/aspnetcore-6.0?view=aspnetcore-6.0
What is their current position on the issue?Are they open to pressure from within Government? Are they open to external pressure and if so, from whom?
Who do you write to? Ask yourself the below questions to help work out who you should be targeting.
Who has the power to make the change you are seeking?
What is their current position on the issue?
Are they open to pressure from within Government? Are they open to external pressure and if so, from whom?
What are the best ways to influence them?
Analyse texts (newspaper or any other relevant articles) using critical discourse analysis and multimodal discourse analysis. Refer to linguists such as Norman Fairclough, Theo Van Luuewen, Teun A. Van Dijk, Wodak etc..
Critical discourse analysis & multimodal discourse analysis
Analyse texts (newspaper or any other relevant articles) using critical discourse analysis and multimodal discourse analysis. Refer to linguists such as Norman Fairclough, Theo Van Luuewen, Teun A. Van Dijk, Wodak etc..
“What Finland is really doing to improve its acclaimed schools:Discuss?
Revise
What Americans keep ignoring about Finland’s school success.” The Atlantic 12 (2011): 29.
Strauss, Valerie.
“What Finland is really doing to improve its acclaimed schools.”
How did this get to be problem? Is it man-made? Is it a natural event? When did people begin to be concerned about this?) scope
The history of the problem (in other words, how did this become a social problem),
scope of the problem (just how big is it? How many people does it effect? Are there financial problems as a result or deaths?
How do YOU define this issue and why do you define it that way?)
history
How did this get to be problem? Is it man-made? Is it a natural event? When did people begin to be concerned about this?) scope
How big is this issue? What is the financial/social impact? What will happen if we don’t do something to help?)
why it matters to you
(Of all the social issues, you chose this one. Why?)
All social issues have multiple existing solutions, so what is currently being done to “fix” this one? Some solutions may be aimed at the entire problem, but others may be just partial solutions.)
evaluation of solutions
What is working effectively? What is not working? WHY are they working or not working?)
conclusion
Does the author to try to establish a Connection with reader? Is it effective?
has the audience put limitations on the author (biases)?
Does the authors background limit the argument?
Does the author have values that limit him or her from hearing the other side?
Does the reader have values that limit him or her from hearing the other side?
M is for motivation
What prompted the writer to write this (motivation)
Author’s experience with this topic?
does the author have an ulterior motive?
What certainty had he that a single human creature now living was on his side? And what way of knowing that the dominion of the Party would not endure for ever?
What certainty had he that a single human creature now living was on
his side? And what way of knowing that the dominion of the Party would not endure
for ever?
How effectively does your selected author use evidence? Does the evidence make the premises and conclusions of the argument strong? Is the evidence accurate, relevant, representative, and sufficient enough to prove the point? What is the source of the evidence? What authorities are cited to support the premises? Are these authorities reliable and credible? Has the evidence been manipulated in questionable ways?
Unknown
Choose one of the following options as you discuss the flawed aspect:
How effectively does your selected author use evidence? Does the evidence make the premises and conclusions of the argument strong? Is the evidence accurate, relevant, representative, and sufficient enough to prove the point? What is the source of the evidence? What authorities are cited to support the premises? Are these authorities reliable and credible? Has the evidence been manipulated in questionable ways?
How does your selected author engage or fail to engage a specific community in his paper? How does the writer treat the targeted community as he or she develops his paper?
What is your argument about his use of diction, imagery and tone? and 2) what do these have in common besides being types of rhetorical devices? You want a paper that has paragraphs that connect to one another via a carefully crafted structure.
Who is your audience for this paper, besides me—the teacher?
What is your purpose in analyzing someone else’s argument?
What is the primary subject? What separate issues are discussed? How many sources are included, and what is the date range?
Literature Review
Respond in at least 250 words (your own words) to the following questions: What is a literature review? Why do scholars write them–and read them? How are they organized? How does the researcher determine the issues to be discussed? Does the literature review simply summarize, or does it involve synthesis as well? How does it differ from a traditional research paper?
Turning your attention to the samples provided, select one, and analyze it in about 150 words: What is the primary subject? What separate issues are discussed? How many sources are included, and what is the date range?
In about 100 words, how will you use these resources as you plan, research, and write your own literature review?