Explain how the source is relevant to your paper. Explain how this particular source will help you develop one or more of the main points in your essay.

Analyzing and Comparison Essay 

What is the annotated bibliography looks like. Your job: filling in the information with the sources you’ve found.

In your annotation, summarize the main points of the source. Be sure to summarize the main points using your own words. Do not copy and paste information directly from the source.

Explain how the source is relevant to your paper. Explain how this particular source will help you develop one or more of the main points in your essay.

If you require a second paragraph for your annotation, indent an additional 0.5” and then explain how the source is relevant to your paper. Explain how this particular source will help you develop one or more of the main points in your essay.

Explain how the source is relevant to your paper. Explain how this particular source will help you develop one or more of the main points in your essay.

Explain how the source is relevant to your paper. Explain how this particular source will help you develop one or more of the main points in your essay.

What the annotated bibliography looks like. Your job: filling in the information with the sources you’ve found.

How much (if at all) has the way society defines violence changed? Should it change more or less? Who determines this definition?Is there a way to increase or encourage diversity? How much is diversity even possible? What is the role (if any) of entertainment and media in diversity?

1,250 – 1,500 words in response to one of the “Questions for Inquiry” that were developed by the class.
The response should include the following:
At least 2 scholarly outside sources (things we haven’t read or viewed as a class)
A “Works Cited” Page
MLA Format throughout the document
Document should be submitted in .doc, .docx, .rtf, or .pdf format only

War and Violence

To what degree, if at all, is violence and war necessary? How much violence is too much? And who should decide? How much, do we need violence in our world?

How much (if at all) has the way society defines violence changed? Should it change more or less? Who determines this definition?

Is there a way to increase or encourage diversity? How much is diversity even possible? What is the role (if any) of entertainment and media in diversity?

Climate Change and Environmentalism

Is climate change realistically manageable? What should we do about it, who’s responsibility is it? When will it be too late to do something about it? Is it already too late?

What is the tone of the review? Is it humorous, serious, pessimistic, optimistic? Something else entirely? What makes you say that?Look back at what you wrote for number one. Do you think the review effectively accomplished its main point? Why or why not? Do you find it persuasive? Why or why not?

 The Anthopocene Reviewed Introduction

Read: the following in-The Anthropocene Reviewed.

1. “The Hall of Presidents” by John Green from The Anthropocene Reviewed.
2. “New Partner” by John Green from The Anthropocene Reviewed.
3. “Academic Decathlon” by John Green from The Anthropocene Reviewed

Do:
1. Complete The Anthropocene Reviewed Reflection 1

2. Answer the following five questions in one document (must be a Word file or PDF).  number each question clearly.

The Anthropocene Reviewed Reflection 1
First, take a few minutes to reflect on what you read. Next, pick one review to focus on and provide thoughtful and thorough answers to the following questions. The answers should be, roughly speaking, at least 3-5 sentences (more isn’t a bad thing!).

1. What is the main point of the review? It might be to inform, to inspire, to persuade, to change your perspective, or something else entirely.

2. What is the tone of the review? Is it humorous, serious, pessimistic, optimistic? Something else entirely? What makes you say that?

3. What is one section of the review that stood out to you and why? In your answer, provide a quotation for this section and explain why you think this quotation is important.

4. Where do you see ethos, pathos, or logos in the review? Again, provide a quotation for where you see an example of ethos, pathos, or logos and explain if you think John’s use of this rhetorical appeal is effective or not and why.

5. Look back at what you wrote for number one. Do you think the review effectively accomplished its main point? Why or why not? Do you find it persuasive? Why or why not?

Identify strategies for making visual arguments.Explain how the ad works—what message does it send, and what elements in the ad contribute to this message?

Visual Analysis

Identify strategies for making visual arguments.
First, identify a video advertisement at least thirty seconds in length that you would like to analyze. The ad should be freely accessible online, whether on YouTube or via some other site, and it can promote a product, service, person, organization, location, or anything else. Here are three examples of ads that would make appropriate choices:Study the ad you’ve selected closely, noting the argument it makes, the individual claims that comprise this argument, the visual elements used to support these claims, the ad’s use of rhetorical appeals, and any logical errors you can detect. Then, write a letter to a competitor of the person/organization/company that produced the ad you’re analyzing. (For example: if you’re analyzing the Chevy Sonic ad above, you might write to Ford or Honda.) In this letter, explain how the ad works—what message does it send, and what elements in the ad contribute to this message? Frame your explanation as advice to the competitor, commenting on whether and how the competitor might respond to the message the ad is sending.

To what extent would King have agreed with Lao-tzu’s views? Would Lao-tzu have supported King’s position in his letter, or would he have interpreted events differently?

To what extent do Martin Luther King Jr.’s views about government coincide with those of Lao-tzu? Is there a legitimate comparison to be made between King’s policy of nonviolent resistance and Lao-tzu’s judicious inactivity?

To what extent would King have agreed with Lao-tzu’s views? Would Lao-tzu have supported King’s position in his letter,
or would he have interpreted events differently?

Compose an analytical essay about community-college education, 1,000 words minimum in length and MLA-formatted.

Compose an analytical essay about community-college education, 1,000 words minimum in length and MLA-formatted.

A title announcing the topic in some way is required. Include a brief quote (no more than three (3) lines), found on brainyquote.com, that must contain the word education.

One quote is required; only one quote is permitted. (Use an ellipsis … or brackets [ ] in the quote as needed if you omit words from the original quote for economy and conciseness or add words of your own for clarity and context.)

For this assignment, a Works Cited page listing the source is not permitted.

Write a one-page paper (approximately two 13- to 20-sentence paragraphs) with clearly defined terms, topic, and developed  sentence that demonstrates how The First Story is an example of Boccaccio’s humanist views.

And who would not have believed it, hearing a man at the point of death speak thus?

Write a one-page paper (approximately two 13- to 20-sentence paragraphs) with clearly defined terms, topic, and developed  sentence that demonstrates how The First Story is an example of Boccaccio’s humanist views.

start at top of page there will be a cover sheet

Identify your selected film, including writer, director, year of release, and genre.Describe one of the broad theories you have learned about in class (auteur theory, genre theory, formalist theory) and analyze your selected film through that lens.

The Final Film Analysis paper

Movie is Back to the future

Identify your selected film, including writer, director, year of release, and genre.

Briefly summarize the film in which you apply your knowledge of the difference between the film’s story and its plot.

Describe one of the broad theories you have learned about in class (auteur theory, genre theory, formalist theory) and analyze your selected film through that lens.

Evaluate the use of three specific techniques and design elements employed in the film as they contribute to the overarching narrative and theme of the film.

This can include elements of mise-en-scène (e.g., lighting, sound, composition of frame, costuming, etc.) and editing (e.g., cuts and transitions, shots used, angles, etc.).

Describe the connection between this film and society (i.e., politically or culturally, positive or negative) and draw conclusions about its impact.

The Final Film Analysis paper

Must be five to six double-spaced pages (1500 to 1800 words) in length

Describe why you are interested in studying engineering at Princeton. Include any of your experiences in, or exposure to engineering, and how you think the programs offered at the University suit your particular interests. (respond in about 250 words.)

Princeton essays

Describe why you are interested in studying engineering at Princeton. Include any of your experiences in, or exposure to engineering, and how you think the programs offered at the University suit your particular interests. (respond in about 250 words.)
Briefly elaborate on an activity, organization, work experience, or hobby that has been particularly meaningful to you. ( respond in about 150 words.)