Category: Jurisprudence

 How and why do we deal with continuity when the sovereign may die? Do you agree or disagree with Hart’s critique? Do you consider it to be a fair and accurate representation of Austin’s work – to therefore, be a valid criticism in itself?

Essay on Professor Hart’s Legal Theory (for University of London Jurisprudence Module)

Identify the sovereign in terms of everyday life, and the idea of a sovereign
is fundamental to Austin’s theory of law because remember, according to Austin, law is a command of the sovereign. Hart also asks, in terms of sovereignty, what happens when the sovereign changes?

How and why do we deal with continuity when the sovereign may die? Do you agree or disagree with Hart’s critique? Do you consider it to be a fair and accurate representation of Austin’s work – to therefore, be a valid criticism in itself?

What does Hart agree with Austin about? what do all types of positivism have in common?

How would we respond to the cases? How should we respond to the cases? How should we treat people who suffered from COVID-19? How would we fight COVID-19 in a more general sense?

Essay on Joseph Raz’s Legal Theory (for University of London Jurisprudence Module)

Why do we accept authority? Why do we accept an authority? How do we come to do that? Are we, by accepting an authority, subjugating ourselves to it?

What was the threat of the virus? Was it in February, 2020, if you were in Europe and North America, what was the virus? It was going to strike as it had seemingly very hard in China.

How would we respond to the cases? How should we respond to the cases? How should we treat people who suffered from COVID-19? How would we fight COVID-19 in a more general sense?

How would we stop infections? Should we wear masks when in public places? Should we be testing in a mass way?

What is the test to be applied by an appellate court to an assessment of the decision of the trial court in respect of a statutory defence of “lawful excuse” when Convention rights are engaged in a criminal matter?

Analysing Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and others [2021] UKSC 23 case from the perspective of Natural Law Jurisprudence

What is the test to be applied by an appellate court to an assessment of the decision of the trial court in respect of a statutory defence of “lawful excuse” when Convention rights are engaged in a criminal matter?

Is deliberate physically obstructive conduct by protesters capable of
constituting a lawful excuse for the purposes of section 137 of the 1980 Act ,
where the impact of the deliberate obstruction on other highway users is more than de minimis , and prevents them, or is capable of preventing them, from passing along the highway?