The debate over the legalization of marijuana in the United States has been raging for over a century, with both sides having clear points of view. Research and explain the pros and cons of this debate. After you have presented both sides of the debate, decide where you stand in this debate and why.
Describe any controversies, successes, political initiatives, policy changes, or anything you deem pertinent and important to a proper and thorough understanding of the topic of your evaluation proposal.
Explain the impact of political and ethical issues associated with the program evaluation.
Identify the impacts and issues that will be readily identifiable and those that could be inadvertent, affecting stakeholders after the completion of the proposed evaluation. (Not all unexpected impacts are negative, so it is entirely possible unintended outcomes could be beneficial. Make sure to include such happy accidents.)
Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.
Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.
Prior to beginning work on the discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week.
Utilize research skills to locate an appropriate scholarly program evaluation proposal. Critique the design of the program evaluation. Examine the research hypothesis.
Analyze the evaluability of the program or policy under consideration by the researcher.
Describe the research methodology employed by the researcher, and identify any ethical issues that might be salient to the study. It might be savvy to select an article based upon a design you might consider using for your Final Paper.
What intellectual property issues arise in your workplace?” Some prompts you might consider:
Who important is IP in your business?
How much time and attention has been paid to IP policies, forms, and legal issues?
What role does IP play in the HR context (forms, departing employees, new employees, etc.)
• Do the enforcement mechanisms for the FLSA match the challenges it presents?
• How might we amend the law or alter enforcement to account for the nature of work and changes in the labor market in the 21st Century?
• If you were to modernize the FLSA, would you make changes to the scope of exempt and non-exempt employees? If so, how? Be specific in your analysis.
Differences between the OECD MR and the EU Draft Directive on Pillar 2 :Discuss?
Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.
Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.
Proposal Narrative
Present your measures and methodology from the assignment you completed in Week Three.
Critique the design of the program or policy by describing the methodology, including the data to be collected, the means of collection, and how the data will be used.
Identify a proposed budget and projected schedule for the evaluation.
Summary
Summarize the expected outcomes, the questions to be answered, and the expected results that would indicate success of the program or policy.
The “Evaluation Proposal,” Final Paper
Explain the impact of political and ethical issues associated with program evaluation. Explain the process involved in formulating and developing a quality evaluation question.
Identify pertinent components that good evaluation questions should contain. In addition, identify an appropriate topic for the Final Paper, and formulate a preliminary research evaluation question relevant to that assignment.
Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.
Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.
Present your measures and methodology from the assignment you completed in Week Three.
Critique the design of the program or policy by describing the methodology, including the data to be collected, the means of collection, and how the data will be used.
Identify a proposed budget and projected schedule for the evaluation.
Summary
Summarize the expected outcomes, the questions to be answered, and the expected results that would indicate success of the program or policy.
Identify the name of the case and page number in the textbook.)
Parties: (Identify the plaintiff and the defendant.)
Facts: (Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case.)
Issue: (Note the central question or questions on which the case turns.)
Applicable Law(s): (Identify the applicable laws.) Use the textbook here by using citations. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.
How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?)
Reasoning: (Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.)
Case Questions: (Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.)
Religion at Work – Accommodate or Conflict? answer the following question in two Paragraph of about 6 to 7 sentences each.
Employee sues his employer, saying that he is being sexually harassed by gay males, who only harass young male employees. Does he have a cause of action? [Wrightson v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., 99 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 1996) Attached the chapter reading/References
Two Paragraphs in a length of 6 to 7 sentences each
