Category: Law

Critically evaluate the capacity of shareholders to participate in the governance of their corporations, making specific reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Company law

‘Enhancing shareholder powers cannot improve corporate governance if shareholders do not wish to exercise their powers’.

Critically evaluate the capacity of shareholders to participate in the governance of their corporations, making specific reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Students will be assessed on the following criteria:

The structure of the work so that statements, arguments and conclusions flow coherently and logically (LO3)1

Evaluation of the relevant legal and non legal issues and arguments (LO2)

Communication in good English (LO5)

Critical analysis of the relevant issues and arguments in the area, identifying and evaluating competing perspectives whilst showing an awareness of present-day

topical issues and new concepts (LO2)

Presentation of the law within its wider context (LO2)

Critical and creative reflection on the material used and conclusions reached; (LO3)

Depth and breadth of research, with the ability to judge the significan

What percent of discount will get if it’s the whole 50 thousand word limit am instructing your writing company?what’s going to be duration to complete 50k word limit?

The impact of Covid-19 on the right of girls child to Education in Nigeria: making a case for social- policy Reform

If the writer can interpret data collected or do you have an expert who does that?

Can maintain one writer throughout the duration of my program?

What percent of discount will get if it’s the whole 50 thousand word limit am instructing your writing company?

what’s going to be duration to complete 50k word limit?

Can we have a payment plan for the whole project?

What remedies, if any, are available to Sam for the causes of action you discussed?Do you think Sam will prevail in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cause of action against the TSA? Why, or why not?

Unit 8 Discussion
Sam has retained the attorney, for whom you work, to bring an action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Answer the following questions:

Do you think Sam will prevail in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cause of action against the TSA? Why, or why not?

In addition to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cause of action, what other cause(s) of action may be available to Sam? Do you think Sam will prevail? Why, or why not?

What remedies, if any, are available to Sam for the causes of action you discussed?

Explain to Rick whether the amounts in the above-mentioned transactions would or would not be allowable deductions for income tax purposes in the 2021 income year.

Taxation law (Australia law_Principle of Taxation Law)

Explain to Rick whether the amounts in the above-mentioned transactions would or would not be allowable deductions for income tax purposes in the 2021 income year.

Provide a summary of the Court’s judgment. If there were dissenting opinions, what were the bases for these objections to the judgment?

Maritime Delimitation Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), 2014

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), 2014

Questions to Address:

Provide a summary for what the case is about, who are the parties involved, what are the specific issues in dispute, who brought the case forward, etc.

Describe the jurisdictional issues involved in the case, including each party’s right to bring the case to the ICJ, and the Court’s interpretation about which source of jurisdiction (if any) is applicable. Be specific about the forms of jurisdiction being used and the instruments they relate to (e.g., compulsory, compromissory (treaties)). Were there multiple sources of jurisdiction in this case? If so, how did the Court choose among them?

Provide a summary of the Court’s judgment. If there were dissenting opinions, what were the bases for these objections to the judgment?

Is your sense from reading these materials that the dispute in question was resolved through this adjudication attempt? Did the parties comply with the Court’s judgment?

Are considerations like the nature of the relationship relevant? If not this specific consideration, then are there any others? Should they be relevant or not in a family home? In other contexts? Do they promote autonomy? Do they promote anything else that makes them important to consider? Is the intervention of the courts misguided?

Trusts of the family home

To what extent do you agree?

Also  endeavour to answer all parts of the question. E.g. Are considerations like the nature of the relationship relevant? If not this specific consideration, then are there any others? Should they be relevant or not in a family home? In other contexts? Do they promote autonomy? Do they promote anything else that makes them important to consider? Is the intervention of the courts misguided?