Law and society
What kinds of feminist theory are evident in this video? What are some
specific examples that illustrate them or the differences between “generations” of
feminist theory?
Category: Law
Critically assess the submissions of India and Italy in the Enrica Lexie Case, and provide your opinion as to whether the judgment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration upheld the rights of the coastal state (India), the rights of the flag State (Italy) or both
Case Study of the Enrica Lexie
In approximately 1500 words, critically assess the submissions of India and Italy in the Enrica Lexie Case, and provide your opinion as to whether the judgment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration upheld the rights of the coastal state (India), the rights of the flag State (Italy) or both
Describe the major classical theories of crime, including the significance of their socio-historical context. This would encompass.
On the successful completion of the course, students will be able to:
1.) Describe the major classical theories of crime, including the significance of their socio-historical context. This would encompass:
a.) Being familiar with the various schools of early criminological thought;
b.) Understanding the key terminology, concepts and methodologies used by classical thinkers.
2.) Critically analyze and evaluate classical criminological thought and theorizing:
a.) From a methodological standpoint;
b.) By highlighting the sociological implications and consequences of such theorizing as they pertain to race, gender and social class.
3.) Apply classical criminological theory to a variety of historical and contemporary issues. This would include:
a.) Using theory to help inform and explain current events;
b.) Proposing solutions to contemporary crime problems within Canadian society.
4.) Appreciate and understand the importance of good theory building and testing for sociological and criminological inquiry.
5.) Think bigger, more critically and more creatively than they ever thought possible.
Explain who originally held the Property at law and in equity?Explain whether the trustee in bankruptcy be able to force a sale of The Paddocks?
Land Law
a) Explain who originally held the Property at law and in equity?
b) Explain who now holds the property:
a. at law
b. in equity?
c) Explain whether the trustee in bankruptcy be able to force a sale of The Paddocks?
Roxanne was the registered proprietor of a large house. The attic had been converted to a self-contained flat (‘the Flat’). Roxanne advertised the Flat in the following way:
‘Two-bedroomed top floor flat, suitable for a couple or two singles, available for immediate occupation at £550 per month.’
Eight months ago, sisters Angie and Valerie viewed the Flat, liked it, and signed a Licence Agreement which included the following terms:
1. Roxanne hereby agrees that Angie and Valerie (‘the Licensees’) may occupy the Flat as licensees for a period of two years starting 1 February 2021.
2. The licence fee for the Flat is £550 per month.
3. Roxanne may enter the Flat at any time without notice in the event of an emergency and may retain a key to the Flat for that purpose.
4. Roxanne reserves the right to introduce one other person to share the Flat with the Licensees.
5. The Licensees will keep the Flat in a good state of repair.’
Explain to Angie and Valerie:
a) Whether they have a lease or a licence of the Flat, and why this matters;
b) Who is responsible for the repair to the bathtub; and
c) Whether they have to leave the Flat as instructed by Sarah.
‘The first and perhaps the most significant constraint on most judges is the doctrine of precedent, without which judge-made law could descend into arbitrariness. The obligation on a court lower in the hierarchy to abide by a precedent set by a hie:Discuss?
Was this action legal under U.S. domestic law? Under international law? Are there any foreign law consequences? What additional factual information, if any, would you need to?address legalit.Do you see any meaningful distinction between what acceptable legal and policy options the executive had in this instance?
National security
Was this action legal under U.S. domestic law? Under international law? Are there any foreign law consequences? What additional factual information, if any, would you need to?address legalit
Do you see any meaningful distinction between what acceptable legal and policy options the executive had in this instance?
When introducing constitutional and international case law, you should apply that law with a rigorous comparison of the precedent case’s facts to your facts.
Critically evaluate the success of the SCSL in attaining the multilateral objectives of the UN, Sierra Leone, and the international community At what point in the novel did you become convinced of Dracula’s evil?
International Criminal Law
Critically evaluate the success of the SCSL in attaining the multilateral objectives of the UN, Sierra Leone, and the international community At what point in the novel did you become convinced of Dracula’s evil? Try to name a specific incident.
.At what point in the novel did you become convinced of Dracula’s evil? Try to name a specific incident.
In the 1970s during the Barcelona Traction case the ICJ decision noted both the lack of, and need for customary international law to govern the global activities of corporations, what does SCOTUS’ ruling and opinions in Sosa v. Alverez-Machain tell us about how the body of international law on corporations has evolved?
International Criminal Law
In the 1970s during the Barcelona Traction case the ICJ decision noted both the lack of, and need for customary international law to govern the global activities of corporations, what does SCOTUS’ ruling and opinions in Sosa v. Alverez-Machain tell us about how the body of international law on corporations has evolved?
How does the bill work to solve the issue?What are the bill’s main points?What’s the purpose of the bill?Who is the sponsor?
Bill summary
1. What it does?
2. Who is the sponsor?
3. What’s the purpose of the bill?
4. What are the bill’s main points?
5. How does the bill work to solve the issue?
What would he (Calvin) have to prove to show a court that he did not have the necessary mental capacity when he authorized Billy to sell the penny?Did Billy exert undue influence over Calvin to cause Calvin to enter into the contract that allowed Billy to sell the penny?
Unit 4 Case Study
Did he (Calvin) have the mental capacity to enter into the contract when he agreed to let Billy sell the penny?
What would he (Calvin) have to prove to show a court that he did not have the necessary mental capacity when he authorized Billy to sell the penny?Did Billy exert undue influence over Calvin to cause Calvin to enter into the contract that allowed Billy to sell the penny?
What do you think? Does Calvin have a case to set aside the contract with Billy on either of these theories?
Your case study should be at least two pages in length and include at least two outside sources.
Be sure to use APA formatting for all citations and references.
Resources