What does each diary contribute to our historical understanding of their respective plague event? What do plague diaries allow us to see that other kinds of historical sources do not?

Which elements – in terms of narrative story-telling devices and themes – do they have in common? What does each diary contribute to our historical understanding of their respective plague event? What do plague diaries allow us to see that other kinds of historical sources do not?

Pepy’s Diary:
https://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/

Fang Fang:
https://glose.com/read/wuhan-diary/contents

Thucydides is attached as a pdf.

Why is this important, potential limitations, maybe speculate why is the results are as they are, and what more can be done preferably from a one health point of view.

Antimicrobial Resistance. Using logistic regression (in RStudios) to investigate variation in the trends for E.coli resistance (to three major antibiotic classes) in European countries

The main points to hit for the discussion is obviously to reiterate the main findings and objectives. What was found for each of the countries, not all the countries have significant P values so can be ignored.

Why is this important, potential limitations, maybe speculate why is the results are as they are, and what more can be done preferably from a one health point of view.

What are the sensitive and special considerations for physical examination and pharmacological administration? What are the anatomical, psychological, and physiological differences?What are the special considerations the nurse should take when implementing the nursing process and providing care?

Invasive ductal carcinoma

Your paper should include a title page and at least 3 references. Minimum word count is 1000-1250 words. Include the following in your essay:

Briefly explain the types and pathophysiology of breast cancer and risk factors

In the older adult population describe the following:

What are the sensitive and special considerations for physical examination and pharmacological administration? What are the anatomical, psychological, and physiological differences?

What are the cultural, spiritual, religious, and linguistic sensitive and special communication and collaboration considerations and differences?

What are the special considerations the nurse should take when implementing the nursing process and providing care?

Provide at least 2 clinical manifestations

What types of therapies would be used for this patient?

What drug/ classification may be utilized for her type of cancer?

What are the considerations and nursing management for the patient receiving radiation and chemotherapy? What complications could arise?

Provide 2 nursing diagnosis using the NANDA format

NANDA (2012) NANDA Nursing Diagnosis List.

Provide 3 expected outcomes

Provide 4 nursing interventions

What are some supportive interventions for her and her family
Conclude your paper by discussing how you will evaluate your plan of care

Provide a brief summary of the main research study aims/ objectives, methods and findings.Provide a critical appraisal of the article, justifying your rationale for the main strengths and limitations of the study. 

Provide a brief summary of the main research study aims/ objectives, methods and findings.

Provide a critical appraisal of the article, justifying your rationale for the main strengths and limitations of the study.

Note that marks will be awarded for highlighting strengths and limitations of the study other than those stated by the authors throughout the article.3. 250 – 300 words

The article to be critically appraised has been attached below

What other thoughts and connections did you make? Did it connect with your experiences outside the class? Did it connect with material you have learnt in other classes

Reflection

A reflective component. This involves an explanation of its personal impact: Why did this material stand out for you? Did you agree or disagree with it?

What other thoughts and connections did you make? Did it connect with your experiences outside the class? Did it connect with material you have learnt in other classes

Describe the proportion of patients in whom the therapies are effective and whether we see durable responses in them as in sometimes the case with immune checkpoint inhibitors in other types of cancers.

Immunotherapy response prediction in gynaecological cancers

Describe the proportion of patients in whom the therapies are effective and whether we see durable responses in them as in sometimes the case with immune checkpoint inhibitors in other types of cancers.

Discuss the problem of current conventional response to immunotherapy prediction markers and the need to find novel ones that may enable more patients to benefit from immunotherapy as well as filtering the ones that may not benefit from immunotherapy.

Suggested tables in the manuscript:

1. list of immunotherapy agents by cancer type with listed studies, summarized results (e.g. ORR, number of patients) and mentioned any inclusion criteria including markers of response that respresented inclusion criteria (e.g. MMR status, MSI status etc.)

2. list of novel, emerging biomarkers studied with summary of marker type, correlation with clinical and histopathological data and conventional biomarkers.

How does it work?What was its original intended use?What are the common side effects or long term effects?

Hypoxemia

1st paragraph
a. list the name of the drugs or surgical procedures that are currently used to treat this disease.
i. Make sure to describe the drug or surgical procedure.
1. How does it work?
2. What was its original intended use?
3. What are the common side effects or long term effects?

2nd paragraph
a.  list any drug(s) or procedures that are in clinical trials for this disease.
i.  list in which phase of clinical trials the drug is in
ii. list the method of drug delivery and how it works (if known)

general conclusion

Why did this material stand out for you? Did you agree or disagree with it? What other thoughts and connections did you make? Did it connect with your experiences outside the class? Did it connect with material you have learnt in other classes?

MODULE REFLECTION & RESPONSE PAPER

You are required to write four first-person personal reflections and response papers on the class material. One for each module.

These assignments are based in an open-ended question in order to give you the freedom to focus on whatever material in that Module was most interesting or stimulating to you.

Part One: Reflection THIS IS THE MATERIAL ( https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/06/24/last-call-3 )

In your own reflection include 3 components:

A description of the material including reference to specific reading(s). What was the main argument in the reading? am looking here for a clear summary of the material. You are just simply describing what the material claims.

An analysis of the material. Here you are looking to identify any assumptions, limits in the material OR/AND the parts of the material that are compelling and evidence based

A reflective component. This involves an explanation of its personal impact: Why did this material stand out for you? Did you agree or disagree with it? What other thoughts and connections did you make? Did it connect with your experiences outside the class? Did it connect with material you have learnt in other classes?

 

Discuss the biological, behavioral, environmental, and/or social risk factors associated with the Leading Health Indicator you chose to focus upon in Module 1. (Public transit, Housing for different incomes as well as different stages of life, and Community centers.)

Discussion

Discuss the biological, behavioral, environmental, and/or social risk factors associated with the Leading Health Indicator you chose to focus upon in Module 1. (Public transit, Housing for different incomes as well as different stages of life, and Community centers.)