Write about Parkinson’s disease in the geriatric population Address with a brief pathophysiology for Parkinson’s disease , risk factors, assessment questions, physical exam , challenges with diagnosis and treatment and roles of the Psyche mental health nurse practitioner in caring for patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Topic: Geriatric Mental Health Disorders

Write about Parkinson’s disease in the geriatric population
Address with a brief pathophysiology for Parkinson’s disease ,
risk factors, assessment questions, physical exam , challenges with diagnosis and treatment and roles of the Psyche mental health nurse practitioner in caring for patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Brief Etiology/Pathophysiology
Risk Factors
Assessment Questions
Physical Exam
Challenges with Diagnosis and Treatment
Roles of the PMHNP in caring for the patients

Explain the duty of care and the duty of candour you have towards patients and relate it to the case study (450 words).The patient’s capacity has not been determined, explain your role in ensuring that best interest are meet and they are safeguarded (450 words).

The professional, legal and ethical frameworks that underpin Nursing practice
Harvard style referencing

Questions

1. Explain the duty of care and the duty of candour you have towards patients and relate it to the case study (450 words).

2. The patient’s capacity has not been determined, explain your role in ensuring that best interest are meet and they are safeguarded (450 words).

3. Discuss how you would ensure safe care and anti discrimination practice is provided for the patient (450 words).

How will enrolling in the B.S./M.S. Dual Degree Program at NYU Meyers help you achieve these goals? Why is your specific master’s degree program of choice a good fit for you?

Your essay should discuss your academic and professional goals and should be 2-3 pages (double spaced) in length. Your essay should answer questions such as: How will enrolling in the B.S./M.S. Dual Degree Program at NYU Meyers help you achieve these goals? Why is your specific master’s degree program of choice a good fit for you?

What is it that you like? What is it that you dislike? Which particular component(s) of the theory have contributed to your feelings?

Name a theory that you like and find workable. What is it that you like? What is it that you dislike? Which particular component(s) of the theory have contributed to your feelings?

If you were going to describe the features of a theory that would be most useful for nursing, what would you say? What would the components of such a theory look like?

Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses).

Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence.

A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.

Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library.

Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses).

The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Write about your understanding of how colonisation has impacted Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and how partnerships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health professionals, organisations and communities are delivering culturally safe health care.

Write about your understanding of how colonisation has impacted Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and how partnerships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health professionals, organisations and communities are delivering culturally safe health care.

How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?

WK3 Assignment: Analyzing Group Techniques

The Assignment
In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:

What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?

What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?

What did you notice that the therapist did well?

Explain something that you would have handled differently.

What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?

Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member?

How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?

Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

Identify key stakeholders who need to ‘buy-in’ to solution’s implementation and the importance of their buy-in. Assess competing solutions for the proposed CDSS which expands upon their existing gaps or inevitable competition for the proposed CDSS.

Executive Final Presentation Paper for Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) Implementation and Evaluation

In this paper, you will use your defined problem from M4A1 to create an implementation and evaluation plan for a CDSS to solve the problem.

In your paper, you will draw upon the readings and assignments thus far to evaluate the current environment in which the problem exists, policies and procedures, training needed, implementation stages, and a process for evaluating the outcome.

The 10-12 page final project (excluding title page and reference list; abstract not required) will be an expanded version of the project proposal and should include all of the following criteria:

Implementation Context (20 points):

Describe the problem, the setting, and the context.

Identify impacted end user(s).

Breakdown the workflow of the impacted end user(s) without the technology and predict workflow with the technology.

Identify key stakeholders who need to ‘buy-in’ to solution’s implementation and the importance of their buy-in.
Assess competing solutions for the proposed CDSS which expands upon their existing gaps or inevitable competition for the proposed CDSS.

Implementation Approach (20 points):
Identify key champions who garner change for a successful clinical implementation.

Identify risks upon implementation and subsequent methods to mitigate identified risks relating to any existing impediments (change management, behavior management, cultural notions, etc.).

Describe data sources needed and extracted from source systems, and the complexity of obtaining such data elements.

Implementation Plan (20 points):

Create a roll-out plan for health care organization to include target areas such as specific service lines, levels of care, etc.
Develop an education plan required to train clinical (or other) end users.

Discuss how you will ensure connectivity and integration to databases encompassing data sources needed for the solution’s success.

Predict environmental and cultural factors which may inhibit the success of the solution.

Outline methods to mitigate risk with the product’s implementation such as change management, behavior management, cultural notions, data obtainment, data timeliness, etc. (specifically to speak to your identified clinical or project champion).

Evaluate existing policies/processes which need to change in order to accommodate the implementation of the CDSS.
Implementation Goals & Evaluation (20 points):

Compose the goals/outcomes which prove the success (or lack thereof) of the solution’s implementation.

Describe the framework or theory to be utilized as the conceptual underpinning of the project and to assist in the evaluation of the project.

Design the methodology of obtaining feedback in order to measure the success of the solution’s implementation.

Discuss the milestones that must be achieved before further-roll out of the CDSS occurs across the organization.
Organization, Writing Style, Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, and Formatting (20 points):

Presentation and style of the paper are consistent with scholarly work and reflect use of APA format (7th ed.).
Be sure to include the requirements outlined in the scoring.

The paper is limited to 10 – 12 pages (excluding the title page and references; abstract not required) and must reflect APA 6th edition standards for formatting (e.g., title page, 2-level headings, references, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, usage) and writing consistent with Standard American English.