Morals
What’s right vs wrong? What triggers our thoughts and actions to determine if something is right or wrong?
What’s right vs wrong? What triggers our thoughts and actions to determine if something is right or wrong?
A consideration of the history of world civilization as well as current world events suggests that there exists a chasm, a very wide gap, which must be crossed in order for interreligious communication to take place.
In your view, given that the different historical backgrounds and cultural settings of people around the world entail that at least some sort of gap or divide does indeed exist, should there be an effort to bridge this to allow for interreligious communication? Is closing this gap even possible?
What are some specific elements that create the gap?
What are some of the reasons that may be advanced in favor of interreligious communication and understanding?
What are some of the commonalities among religious belief systems that might form a basis for communication? Do the differences among various religious belief systems outweigh the commonalities?
Should the cultural diversity stemming from such differences be valued and maintained, or should attempts be made to overcome or even erase some of the differences that make interreligious communication difficult?
Analyze differences and similarities among familiar religious traditions and other, less familiar or foreign, religious traditions.
Analyze different ways of understanding the concept of the divine through cognitive, experiential, and emotional pathways.
Explain how the idea of “having” or “being” a soul, conceived as the basis or essence of personal identity or ego, informs one’s worldview and behavior towards others.
Analyze what the various world religions understand by the term or concept, “God.”
Evaluate the value and importance of religious belief and practice in human society both historically and in the present day.
BODY IN PHILOSOPHY
In Discipline and Punish Foucault distinguishes two registers of the modern machine- body: the “anatomico-metaphysical” and the “technico-political.” Drawing on the readings covered in class (Descartes, Leder, Schiebinger, Foucault) give an account of each of these registers. Given your account, do you think they can or should be ultimately understood as separate?
·
Is there any “stuff” out there? Does anything exist that lies beyond perception? How would Berkeley answer? How would Churchland answer? How would you answer?
Write an essay of at least 600 words explaining to me why Descartes resorts to what has been called the “evil demon hypotheses.” What is it attempting to do? What is Descartes’ goal by using it?
Land Ethic
Readings for this week, Aldo Leopold’s,. Can you explain how the ideas in your choice might help to explain one’s moral obligations for environmental action? What kinds of action do you think they hint at?
Compare and contrast two different approaches to RELATIVISM:Discuss?
It is a 2500 word essay for ‘In what ways have Asian mind-body practices impacted upon western psychology?
Is “political economy” more accurate than “economics” (which pretends to a sphere and laws of its own) as a term then?
This also raises the question of who/how impacted by both brute force/violence/social threat or the alternative ,support/solidarity (banks, institutions, etc.). So, should we view “economic opportunity” as really just one’s leverage/position in state monitored/intervened on play of “market forces”?
“Should the COVID-19 Vaccine be Mandatory for the use of Public Transportation or Air Travel?”
Explain the ethical theory of utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics.