Does the US Supreme Court’s exercise of judicial review tend to promote
the interests of lawmaking majorities? If so,
(ii) does this pattern emerge in the cert stage, the merits stage, or both,
and (iii) what mechanisms produce this pattern?
What impact, if any, has the internet had upon foreign policy-making?; Are liberal interventionism and humanitarian foreign policy initiatives now discredited?
How do the authors on our class syllabus (Only select from the section on “Fiscal Crisis and Recovery”) understand the NYC fiscal crisis of the 1970s? What happened? Explain.
Describe quality and credibility of underlying sources, data and methodologies
Express and explain uncertainties associated with major analytic judgments
Judgments are conclusions base don underlying intelligence information, analysis and assumptions.
State key assumptions explicitly and explain implications if assumptions are incorrect.
Identify–as appropriate–indicators that would alter judgments
Systematic evaluation of differing hypotheses to explain events or phenomena, explore near-term outcomes, and image possible futures to mitigate surprise and risk.
Identify–as appropriate–indicators that would affect likelihood of identified alternatives
Demonstrates customer relevance and addresses implications.
If offering multiple judgments, identify main analytic message that draws collectively from all of them.
Judgments supported by evidence and coherent reasoning.
Language and syntax should convey meaning unambiguously.
Internally consistent and acknowledge supporting and contrary information.
Explain changes to or consistency of analytic judgments.
Explain how new information or different reasoning led to different judgments
Minor Review Paper: Development Assistance and NGOs
Section II. Summarize 2 articles (2 pages each)
Find 2 articles from peer-reviewed journals published within 7 years that tested an intervention to resolve your client’s issue at Rutgers Libraries https://rutgers.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01RUT_INST:01RUT&lang=en (Links to an external site.)
In your summary of each article, be sure to answer the following questions:
Population(age, gender, ethnicity, economic status, urban / rural population) and study size;
What intervention was studied, when, and for how long;
What research design was used (qualitative, quantitative, longitudinal / short term, randomized / control groups, ABA, case study, meta-analysis, etc.).
Describe method of study(questionnaire, interview, 10 weeks of therapy, focus groups, etc.);
Describe research findings listed in the article (include statistics);
Discuss how article findings are generalizable to your client population and
What you will do differently (if this is the case) to better serve your clients.
1-Businesses in the Political Marketplace: Liberal-Democracy’s Conundrum Hale (Chapter 11 and 12
Young, Kevin A., Tarun Banerjee, and Michael Schwartz. 2018. “Capital Strikes as a Corporate Political Strategy: The Structural Power of Business in the Obama Era.”
Main Discussion Question:
Critically assess the validity of the claim that the political power of corporations should be blamed for allegedly “regressive” tax policies, weak capital controls and growing income inequality in Canada and other liberal democracies.
Is it acceptable for a white adult with a sincere desire to ‘race shift’ to claim a transracial identity as individuals claim transgendered identities?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of lockes account of the emergence of political society.
What extend is Denmark legitimizing WHO as a significant international policy-setter in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic by following its issued recommendations, hence they are non-binding?
Basically, the goal of the is to showcase whether Denmark is legitimizing the WHO or not amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, and if yes, to what extend they do? This would be done by seeing if they follow the recommendations of the organization, and if this is a sign of them legitimizing/de-legitimizing the WHO.
2-Hussain, Waheed, and Jeffrey Moriarty. 2018. “Accountable to Whom? Rethinking the Role
Of Corporations in Political CSR.” Journal of Business Ethics 149 (3): 519–34.
3- Keller, Eileen. 2018. “Noisy Business Politics: Lobbying Strategies and Business Influence
After the Financial Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (3): 287–306.
Main Discussion Question: Main Discussion Question: In what ways could corporate power and influence undermine or promote democratic accountability?
