Category: Uncategorized

Identify two nursing interventions based on that theory (if the author has named nursing interventions), are these holistic and caring and could emerge from the theory you have identified?

Review the article and determine if a holistic nursing theory grounded in caring science is evident, and if so, how it guides nursing practice. Answer the following questions:

1. Does the author identify nursing interventions that are guided by the theory?

3. Are the nursing interventions holistic and caring?

4. Why or why not?

5. If there is no theory identified, you need to recommend a holistic theory grounded in caring science. Include your rationale for choosing this caring science theory.

6. Identify two nursing interventions based on that theory (if the author has named nursing interventions), are these holistic and caring and could emerge from the theory you have identified?

7. If the author has not identified nursing interventions or if those interventions presented in the article do not illustrate holism and caring, then you should recommend two nursing interventions).

8. Applies Sister Roach’s 6 C’s, Mayeroff’s Caring Ingredients, and/or one theory of caring science to the article review (Examples include Boykin & Schoenhofer’s Nursing as Caring, etc.) OR the student may identify and apply a caring theory that could be applied to the paper with prior approval from the professor. All concepts within your selected theory must be utilized. EACH concept from your selected theory must be applied.

9. Provides an article that has been written within the past five years

10. Adheres to APA 7th edition format throughout. Headers are to be utilized to organize your thoughts and provide guidance to the reader.

11.  NOTE: APA/Scholarly papers do NOT support the use of first or second person. For this assignment, you may use first person only in the first paragraph.

Describe and explain your thoughts, beliefs, and feelings about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current practice as a nurse.

Personal phylosophy paper

Personal Philosophy Paper Outline and :

The purpose of this paper is to define, describe, and explain your thoughts, beliefs, and feelings about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current practice as a nurse. These are your philosophical beliefs, so there are no right or wrong answers. If your current philosophy includes any particular nursing or other theories, identify these. This paper should be no more than 5 pages not including the title page or references.

Criteria Points

Introduction – Identify the purpose of the paper 5

Description of factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy 5

Definition, description, and explanation of personal thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm:

1. Person/Client

2. Environment

3. Health

4. Nursing

5. Summarized interrelationship of the concepts 25

Identification and brief description of the nursing theory (theories) found to be the most compatible with the student’s personal philosophy 25

Explanation, with documentation, that demonstrated compatibility of personal philosophy with the nursing theory (theories) identified previously according to:

1. Person/Client

2. Environment

3. Health

4. Nursing

5. Summarized interrelationship of concepts 25

Summary and conclusion 5

Organization, documentation, references, APA formatting 10

Total Points 100

5 (5.00%)

Identify the purpose of the paper

5 (5.00%)

Description of factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy

25 (25.00%)

Definition, description, and explanation of personal thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm: 1. Person/Client 2. Environment 3. Health 4. Nursing 5. Summarized interrelationship of the concepts

25 (25.00%)

Identification and brief description of the nursing theory (theories) found to be the most compatible with the student’s personal philosophy

25 (25.00%)

Explanation, with documentation, that demonstrated compatibility of personal philosophy with the nursing theory (theories) identified previously according to: 1. Person/Client 2. Environment 3. Health 4. Nursing 5. Summarized interrelationship of concepts

5 (5.00%)

Summary and Conclusion

10 (10.00%)

Organization, documentation, references, APA formatting

Why did the nurse fail to inform the patient about adverse effects of certain medication (dizziness, orthostatic hypotension?)Why were ‘risk for falls” signage and “risk for falls” bracelet not being used?

Quality Improvement and Safety Initiatives

Why did the nurse fail to inform the patient about adverse effects of certain medication (dizziness, orthostatic hypotension?)

Why were ‘risk for falls” signage and “risk for falls” bracelet not being used?

At change of shift why didn’t the nurse inform the oncoming nurse about an at- risk patient?

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various types of rule imposed upon legislation that is introduced into the institution.Evaluate the differences in the rule-making process between the chambers and explain why there are those differences.

Module 4: Congressional Rules and Procedures and Decision making

This module discusses the various types of legislation that Congress addresses and the rules and procedures that can either hinder or help legislation to pass.

It closes by addressing the ways in which members make decisions, the influencers of those decisions, and the deals that members make among themselves.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this module, students will be able to:

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various types of rule imposed upon legislation that is introduced into the institution.

Evaluate the differences in the rule-making process between the chambers and explain why there are those differences.

Evaluate various theories of decision-making in Congress.

Discuss the determinants of voting on legislation.

How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography (only for 2nd and 3rd annotated Bibliography)?What is the goal (objective statement) of this source? How do the findings describe meeting (or not meeting) this goal?

Annotated

1. What are the main arguments?

2. What type of research & design?

3. What is the point of this article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article is about, what would you say?

1. How is this a useful source?

2. How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography (only for 2nd and 3rd annotated Bibliography)?

3. Is the information reliable? p. 323 – 324

4. What are possible extraneous variables and limitations? p. 37-38, 154

5. What is the goal (objective statement) of this source? How do the findings describe meeting (or not meeting) this goal?

Discuss the diagnosis, 3 differentials, pathophysiology of disease, diagnostic tests, and interpretation of diagnostic tests, along with a plan of care, in 500 words. Provide a minimum of 2 scholarly citations, with 1 being from UpToDate.

Advanced Nursing Care across the life span nrsg 663

When assessing a male patient, a testicular exam must be completed. These assessments are necessary, beginning with the newborn assessment to the geriatric assessment. Select an abnormality of the testicle, along with what age is a typical presentation of the disorder.

Discuss the diagnosis, 3 differentials, pathophysiology of disease, diagnostic tests, and interpretation of diagnostic tests, along with a plan of care, in 500 words. Provide a minimum of 2 scholarly citations, with 1 being from UpToDate.

Discuss some of the data that you found interesting; include what you believe the purpose (intent) of ANA sharing these results.

Samples and Data Collection

Access the following information. You may read the PDF online or download it.

American Nurses Association. (2014). Fast facts: The nursing workforce 2014: Growth, salaries, education, demographics & trends (Links to an external site.).

Review the data presented in the ANA Fast Facts and describe some of the key attributes/characteristics of this sample of the nursing workforce.

Discuss some of the data that you found interesting; include what you believe the purpose (intent) of ANA sharing these results.

The instruments and tools that we use to collect data need to be reliable and valid. Define these terms and explain the importance of each. Share one way that can be used to collect data that you were not aware of or familiar with.

What concerns brought you in today?Does your child take any medications?Is there any family history of disease?Do you have any other concerns you would like to discuss?

1. What concerns brought you in today?

2. When did you first notice these symptoms?

3. Does your child take any medications?

4. Does your child have any allergies?

5. Is there any family history of disease?

6. Do you have any other concerns you would like to discuss?

Identify the strengths and weaknesses of these sources, pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. (You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources.)

Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution

Based on the topic unemployment and lack of economic opportunity, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solutions to the problem.

This paper, an argumentative essay, will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the items below in separate sections with new headings for each.

Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph. Conclude with a statement that states your proposed solutions to the problem. Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence.

Show why this is a societal problem.

Provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.

Construct an argument supporting your proposed solutions, considering multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution.

Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.

Interpret statistical data from at least three peer-reviewed scholarly sources within your argument.

Discuss the validity, reliability, and any biases.

Identify the strengths and weaknesses of these sources, pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. (You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources.)

Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution.

Provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution.

Explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. (It is important to consider all of society.)

Develop a conclusion for the last paragraphs of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument.

How may the results be applied to clinical practice?In hospitalized cancer patients, how does having visitors and family members at the bedside compare to not having them at the bedside affect their treatment and health during their hospital stay?

Healthcare: Nursing

Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative research study on In hospitalized cancer patients, how does having visitors and family members at the bedside compare to not having them at the bedside affect their treatment and health during their hospital stay? Conduct an initial critical appraisal of the study.

Respond to the overview questions for the critical appraisal of qualitative studies, including:

What type of qualitative research design was utilized to conduct the study?

Are the results valid/trustworthy and credible?

How were the participants chosen?

How were accuracy and completeness of data assured?

How plausible/believable are the results?

Are implications of the research stated?

May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs?

May understandings enhance situational competence?

What is the effect on the reader?

Are the results plausible and believable?

Is the reader imaginatively drawn to the experience?

What are the results of the study?

Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study?

How does the researcher identify the study approach?

Are the data collection and analysis techniques appropriate?

Is the significance/importance of the study explicit?

Does the literature support a need for the study?

What is the study’s potential contribution?

Is the sampling clear and guided by study needs?

Does the researcher control selection of the sample?

Do sample size and composition reflect the study needs?

Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?

Are data collection procedures clear?

Are sources and means of verifying data explicit?

Are researcher roles and activities explained?

Are data analysis procedures described?

Does analysis guide directions of sampling when it ends?

Are data management processes described?

What are the reported results (descriptive or interpretation)?

How are specific findings presented?

Are the data meanings derived from data described in context?

Does the writing effectively promote understanding?

Will the results help me care for my patients?

Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations?

Are the results relevant to patient values and/or circumstances?

How may the results be applied to clinical practice?

be sure to answer the questions thoroughly using complete sentences and APA format. Explain responses to yes/no questions in detail by presenting the information found in the study to support your response.

Provide a reference for the article according to APA format and a copy of the article.
In hospitalized cancer patients, how does having visitors and family members at the bedside compare to not having them at the bedside affect their treatment and health during their hospital stay?