Compare the two lenses in relation to your topic. What are the similarities?Explain how the two lenses contrast with each other in relation to your topic. What are the differences?

Similarities and difference

Describe the two lenses you have selected for your analysis.

Compare the two lenses in relation to your topic. What are the similarities?

Explain how the two lenses contrast with each other in relation to your topic. What are the differences?

Reflect on the benefits of the research process. Consider the following:

What have you gained by looking at your topic through the lenses so far?

What might be some of the benefits of further research?
Guidelines for Submission

Your submission should be a Word document, one to two pages in length, with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Any sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the APA Style Guide available through the Shapiro Library for more information on citations.

Module Six Short Answer Rubric

Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Lens Description Describes the two lenses selected Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more detailed description of the two lenses selected Does not attempt criterion 22.5

Lens Comparison Compares the two lenses in relation to the topic Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include greater analysis in the comparison of the two lenses in relation to the topic Does not attempt criterion 22.5

Lens Contrast Explains how the two lenses contrast with each other in relation to the topic Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more detailed explanation of how the two lenses contrast with each other in relation to the topic Does not attempt criterion 22.5

Research Process Reflects on the benefits of the research process Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more thorough reflection on the benefits of the research process Does not attempt criterion 22.5