How would construct validity be applied in this example, and why would it be important to prove that validity?

Suppose a NASA task force is reviewing a final draft of an accident/incident report, and you have been tasked with determining whether the conclusions presented in the final draft are in line with the data/findings presented within the report.

Why would construct validity be part of your thought process in completing such a task?

Now consider a specific real world example in which NASA needed to investigate an accident/incident to determine the cause.

How would construct validity be applied in this example, and why would it be important to prove that validity?

Note: No duplications allowed – you must choose a real world example that has not already been described in the discussion. The earlier you post, the more choices you’ll have

So far Challenger 1986 Accident, Columbia 2003 Accident and October 28, 2014, Orbital ATK have been taken.