What (if any) resources/technology are used in your practice setting to facilitate coordination of care?How and when do healthcare professionals communicate with one another?

Module 4 Discussion: Care Coordination

After reviewing the various Module 4 Resources related to care coordination., give some thought to the coordination of care in your current practice setting and explore the following questions:

• What (if any) resources/technology are used in your practice setting to facilitate coordination of care?

• How and when do healthcare professionals communicate with one another?

• Are social workers, nurses, or other healthcare professionals available to help promote continuity of care?

• How does the nurse-provider relationship influence coordination of care?

• What role does staffing play in promoting coordination of care?

• What are the primary barriers for providing high quality coordination of care in your setting?

• What opportunities to improve coordination of care can you identify and how might you help promote change?

Craft a 350-500 word response that collectively addresses these questions. You need not include answers to all of these questions in your response, but do use them all to frame your reflection on the coordination of care in your professional practice setting.

Describe aspects of these specific regulations that might impact your delegation decision-making or understanding of scope of practice for UAPs (Unlicensed Assistive Personnel).

Module 4 Assignment: Delegation

In conjunction with your reading assignment to review Delegation and You! in Module 4 Resources,Review the Washington State Nursing Care Quality Assurance Commission (NCQAC) web page(s) (Links to an external site.). Answer the following questions in a short (2 page) APA-styled paper:

1. Describe briefly the kind of information about delegation found on links from the NCQAC website.

2. Identify key differences between RN and LPN scope of practice in WA State and a citation of the regulatory justification for your conclusion.

3. What do WA regulations say about the scope of practice of LPNs in relation to delegation, assigning tasks/functions to others and supervision?

4. Explore at least one hyperlink that is setting specific (hospitals, assisted living, nursing homes, etc) OR UAP role specific (home care worker, nursing assistant, etc). Describe aspects of these specific regulations that might impact your delegation decision-making or understanding of scope of practice for UAPs (Unlicensed Assistive Personnel).

Provide your definition and explanation of what constitutes human factors as a systems discipline. Provide a timeline to illustrate your main points.

Systems psychology

Or this module’s research paper, provide your definition and explanation of what constitutes human factors as a systems discipline. Provide a timeline to illustrate your main points. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

Examine the Research below to identify the qualities of an effective assignment.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext/Introduction
15 pts

Excellent / 13 – 15 Points / Paper provides an effective introduction and a research problem that is intrinsically related to the field of aeronautical science.

It presents strong relationships between factors with accurate real-world examples. It develops a coherent, central theme that is expressed in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout the assignment.
12 pts

Satisfactory / 11 – 12 Points / Paper provides a good introduction and a research problem related to the field of aeronautical science. It presents reasonable relationships between factors with real-world examples.

It develops a good central theme that is expressed in a structured, organized and consistent manner throughout the assignment.
10 pts

Passing / 9 – 10 / Paper provides a satisfactory introduction. Research problem is fairly related to the field of aeronautical science.

It provides satisfactory relationships between factors with examples and specific details. It develops some level of a central theme that is expressed in an acceptably organized manner.
8 pts

Failure / 0 – 8 Points / Paper provides poor or no introduction. Research problem is inadequate and/or has no relation to the field of aeronautical science.

It presents no coherent central theme, no structure and no organization whatsoever.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch
25 pts

Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Paper provides a comprehensive identification and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science.

It designs an effective course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate.

The evidence comes from a wide variety of valid sources. The bibliography is complete and reflects the appropriate sources.
22 pts

Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Paper provides a good identification and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. It designs a good course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate. The evidence comes from many valid sources. The bibliography is complete.
20 pts

Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Paper identifies and analyzes at least a few key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. It designs a satisfactory course of action to solve the proposed research problem. The evidence comes from a satisfactory number of sources. The bibliography is missing some pieces.
18 pts

Failure / 0 – 18 Points / Writing generally shows poor or no evidence the student has done the required research and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. Instead, it generally consists of opinions, feelings and impressions. The bibliography is nonexistent.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension
25 pts

Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Paper presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts and theories, providing new ideas to the field of aeronautical science.

Argument is logical and uses significant examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from valid, external information sources throughout assignment.
22 pts

Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Paper presents a good argument based on pertinent concepts, theories, and frameworks that provides some ideas to the field of aeronautical science.

Argument is logical and uses good examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from satisfactory external information sources throughout assignment.
20 pts

Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Paper presents a valid argument with sparse reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks that provides ideas to the field of aeronautical science.

Argument is fairly logical and uses satisfactory examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from external information sources throughout assignment.
18 pts

Failure / 0 – 18 Points / Argument, when presented, is from evidence and personal opinion. It contains poor linkages to relevant concepts, theories and/or framework. Minimal or no evidence is presented to validate analysis, evaluation or other important elements in the assignment.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
25 pts

Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of outstanding analysis and synthesis of evidence. Formulates excellent resolution and recommendations.

Conclusion includes possible consequences and outcome scenarios.
22 pts

Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of effective analysis and synthesis of evidence. It formulates good resolution, recommendations.

Conclusion includes consequences and outcome scenarios.
20 pts

Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of good analysis and synthesis of evidence. Formulates satisfactory resolution, recommendations. Conclusion does not include consequences and outcome scenarios.
18 pts

Failure / 0 – 18 Points / A partial or minimal attempt is made to offer a resolution, recommendations. Conclusion may be vague, incomplete and/or inappropriate.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
10 pts

Excellent / 8 – 10 Points / Paper efficiently uses current APA guidelines in citations and references. Text is grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors and follows required formatting rules.
10 pts

Passing / 4 – 5 Points / APA guidelines are seldom ignored throughout text, which has major grammar and spelling errors. Formatting rules are satisfactory followed.
10 pts

Satisfactory / 6 – 7 Points / Paper uses current APA guidelines in citations and references. Text has minor grammar and spelling errors, but follows required formatting rules.
3 pts

Failure / 0 – 3 Points / Citations, when present, are sometimes missing and/or are incorrect. A low level of writing is exhibited with a number of mechanical mistakes. Communication is muddle or incomprehensible.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

Explain how these pathologies might apply in a human factors application scenario of your own making. Differentiate between what may be pathologies versus biases.

Systems psychology

You will be presenting at a seminar as a panel member recognized as an expert on systems analysis.

With regard to the Human-Centred Requirements Engineering (HUCRE) workload and performance analysis method, selected cognitive pathologies have been identified and embedded in the model.

Explain how these pathologies might apply in a human factors application scenario of your own making. Differentiate between what may be pathologies versus biases.

Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment

Utilizing this article as one source

A. Gregoriades & A. G. Sutcliffe (2006) Automated assistance for human factors analysis in complex systems, Ergonomics, 49:12-13, 1265-1287, DOI: 10.1080/00140130600612721

Prepare a position paper for the engineers to read that explains what is involved and the benefits that can be realized.Also, provide a few key actions or steps that would move toward accomplishing the director’s intent.

Systems psychology

You are a human factors specialist in your company and a project director has asked you to develop a strategy to broaden the perspectives of the systems engineers when designing projects.

In particular, the director asks that you illustrate how including human factors contributors early in the process can affect the system development more positively and inclusively.

Prepare a position paper for the engineers to read that explains what is involved and the benefits that can be realized.

Also, provide a few key actions or steps that would move toward accomplishing the director’s intent. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

Direct your particular attention to the aspects concerning weighting, bipolar pairs, two interconnected layers, and three types of attractors. Would you consider this model suitable for selected complex and dynamic human-centric systems?

Systems psychology

Consider the nonlinear dynamic artificial neural network model for memory as a template for other human factors engineering applications.

Direct your particular attention to the aspects concerning weighting, bipolar pairs, two interconnected layers, and three types of attractors. Would you consider this model suitable for selected complex and dynamic human-centric systems?

Indicate how you believe these aspects would support or not support your choice. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

In complex and dynamic systems, there are interrelationships and influences. Describe your understanding of how this situation can be approached to minimize the risk of failures.

Systems psychology

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis is grounded in considering each failure as an independent event.

In complex and dynamic systems, there are interrelationships and influences. Describe your understanding of how this situation can be approached to minimize the risk of failures.

Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

Discuss the issue or gap identified during your investigation and explain what business need is not being met. Describe the departments directly affected and discuss the impact the issue or gap has on them. Discuss any additional consequences of the issue or gap for organizational performance, other stakeholders, budget, etc.

Business Need Problem Statement

For this assignment, you will identify a business need and develop the problem statement for your professional project.

1.Investigate an COVID-19 organizational gap or issue to identify a problem or new opportunity that that can be addressed through an informatics solution.

2.Based on your findings, write a 750- to 1,000-word paper that defines the problem or opportunity and explains how it can be addressed through an informatics solution.

Include the following:

Discuss the issue or gap identified during your investigation and explain what business need is not being met.
Describe the departments directly affected and discuss the impact the issue or gap has on them. Discuss any additional consequences of the issue or gap for organizational performance, other stakeholders, budget, etc.

Propose a clinical, technological, or process-related solution that can be implemented to address the identified issue or gap.

Explain how the proposed solution addresses the issue or gap for the departments and how it fulfills the specified business need.

Describe how the proposed informatics solution supports the organization's objectives and overall strategy and operations.

Outline the goals and objectives for the proposed informatics solution. Explain how these align with the departmental and organizational goals.

Create a problem statement that can be used to provide a snapshot of the issue or gap and the proposed solution. Include the following: (a) explanation of problem, (b) description of who and what is affected by the problem, (c) the impact or consequence of the problem, and (d) the proposed solution.

Compare and contrast Machiavelli and Hobbes on human nature, power, and the role of political institutions — by using Machiavelli’s “The Prince”, and Hobbes “Leviathan”

Compare and contrast Machiavelli and Hobbes on human nature, power, and the role of political institutions — by using Machiavelli’s “The Prince”, and Hobbes “Leviathan”

This is an exegetical essay, NOT a research essay. You should write your exegesis using only the required texts:

Machiavelli: “The Prince”, and Hobbes: “Leviathan”. We are not looking for some other author’s reading of the assigned texts; we are looking for your readings of the texts. No secondary texts or sources are to be used.

Citation Style: MLA style while citing.

Determine what actions, information, and data will be necessary (for each deficiency) in order for you, as the responsible Qualified Person, to carry out the Batch disposition?

Batch release by a Qualified Person in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Description

Law and Admin (Case Report)

• You are Qualified Person at PQR Pharma, UK. During Review of a batch of a pre – filled syringe product, you noticed numerous GMP deficiencies during the manufacturing and packaging operation.

You are the only manufacturer of this product which is in the essential medicines list (for neonatal meningitis patients). Each GMP breach in itself has been explained in a deviation report.

However, due to number of GMP breaches, you are reluctant to certify the batch. Upon discussion with senior QA executives within the company it is apparent that they will authorise batch release.

• Determine what actions, information, and data will be necessary (for each deficiency) in order for you, as the responsible Qualified Person, to carry out the Batch disposition?

• Your decision must be based on appropriate risk assessment and backed up by the UK legislation/s in place. The batch was manufactured on 10th July 2021.

Your Task:

• Write a report, detailing your actions with reasons.

• Create a plan of your case report ie create a mind map an figures

• Note: If you use any figures/tables then use appropriate captions and refer them in the text.

• Word limit: 3000 words excluding tables

• GMP Deficiencies

• The contract sterility test laboratory changed sterility test method from membrane filtration to direct inoculation method.

• No training records found of an operator returning from maternity leave.