What research design was used (qualitative, quantitative, longitudinal / short term, randomized / control groups, ABA, case study, meta-analysis, etc.).

Minor Review Paper: Development Assistance and NGOs

Section II. Summarize 2 articles (2 pages each)

Find 2 articles from peer-reviewed journals published within 7 years that tested an intervention to resolve your client’s issue at Rutgers Libraries https://rutgers.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01RUT_INST:01RUT&lang=en (Links to an external site.)

In your summary of each article, be sure to answer the following questions:

Population(age, gender, ethnicity, economic status, urban / rural population) and study size;

What intervention was studied, when, and for how long;

What research design was used (qualitative, quantitative, longitudinal / short term, randomized / control groups, ABA, case study, meta-analysis, etc.).

Describe method of study(questionnaire, interview, 10 weeks of therapy, focus groups, etc.);

Describe research findings listed in the article (include statistics);

Discuss how article findings are generalizable to your client population and
What you will do differently (if this is the case) to better serve your clients.

What statistical tests should be run based on this research design? Is this a strong research design, why or why not? What can be done to improve that?

Peer Review of Research Design Table

Colleague Reviewed:

What type of design was used? Describe this design and why it was appropriate for this research hypothesis.

Describe the groups in the sample.

Was a power analysis performed after the research design was chosen? Was the actual sample size large enough based on the power analysis?

Detailed description of the treatment/intervention.

Identify the common threats to internal and external validity to findings using this design.

Explain the extent to which the findings of the study are generalizable.
What are the limitations of this study?

What statistical tests should be run based on this research design?
Is this a strong research design, why or why not? What can be done to improve that?

Table APA formatting, syntax, grammar and spelling are correct.