Tag: phenomenology

Determine the value of each of the five designs listed below and then critique the utility of each one relative to your research problem.

Create an instructor’s presentation to teach students about qualitative research designs. This week, you were presented with three different qualitative research designs. Determine the value of each of the five designs listed below and then critique the utility of each one relative to your research problem. Create a narrated PowerPoint presentation that includes the following:

Cover and references slides (these do not contribute to sliding count)
The problem to be investigated is Job Satisfaction and Police Resignation in US Policing

A critique of 5 designs:

Grounded Theory
Historical Study
Phenomenology
Ethnography
Case Study

Comparison and contrast of the value of these designs
Defense of your selection of one of the designs covered this week for your proposed dissertation research study.

Note: This presentation should be usable in a teaching environment
Length: 8- to 10-slide PowerPoint narrated presentation. Speaker notes (minimum 200 words per slide)

Explain the method you used considering the type of qualitative research orientation (phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory or case study)

Market research – assessment 1 research project

Explain the method you used considering the type of qualitative research orientation (phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory or case study)

Define the type of research (focus group) and how you will proceed with the data collection (present the data collection instruments).

Explain which will be your unit of analysis.

What was the tradition of inquiry/methodological approach (e.g., historical, social/political, philosophical/ethnographic, case study, phenomenology, heuristic, hermeneutic, etc.)?

Journal article review, Interests, and Research Question

What was the rationale of the study? How is this particular study adding to the body of knowledge in the field? How did the article mention disputes or limitations that might influence this study? What might be a robust research question based on your research interests in light of the findings in the article?

Review of Qualitative Article (1 page): What was the rationale for the study? What was the purpose statement?

What was the tradition of inquiry/methodological approach (e.g., historical, social/political, philosophical/ethnographic, case study, phenomenology, heuristic, hermeneutic, etc.)?

How is this particular study adding to the body of knowledge in the field? How did the article mention disputes or limitations that might influence this study?

What might be a robust research question based on your research interests in light of the findings in the two journal articles?