What other evidence (other than testimony) was significant in establishing or challenging a prima facie case of murder? Why was this significant?

Assignment 3
You may conduct your own research in answering the questions below, but also consider the following two links for support:

Aaron Hernandez

Aaron Hernandez Part 2

After reviewing the information provided, submit a paper using the format below and answering the following questions supported by specific authority from the links provided.

A. Introduction

Give a brief overview of the facts of the case, including an explanation of the specific statute(s) under which the defendant was charged and/or convicted and the ultimate outcome of the case

Give a brief explanation of the burden of proof, which is proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal prosecution.

Give a brief explanation of why the Hernandez trial was so important to the prosecution of crimes in the United States.

B. Opening Statements

Which attorney was most persuasive and why?

Which attorney gave the jury more significant facts to consider and what were those facts?

C. Establishing/Challenging a Prima Facie Case for Murder

Name one key witness who helped establish a prima facie case of homicide for the prosecution or challenged a prima facie case for the defense, and explain why he or she helped or hurt the prosecution of the case.

D. Evidence

What other evidence (other than testimony) was significant in establishing or challenging a prima facie case of murder? Why was this significant?

E. Closing Arguments

Describe why one argument was more persuasive than the other.

Discuss what in particular may have persuaded the jury one way or the other based on the closing argument.

F. Outside Factors

What, if any, outside factors (media, public opinion, etc.) affected the trial and/or the outcome of the case and how did they do so? (What book?)

G. Concluding thoughts

Discuss why this case is important to the study of criminal justice and criminal prosecution, and how reading primary documentation about it has changed your own perspective on the case.

 

 

How is “good” determined? Explain in one or two sentences what the theory argues is the correct way to determine what is right.

Over the course of thousands of years, various theories have been offered to explain the best way to determine what is ethical. The search for “good” or correct actions and thoughts has provided several strong approaches that are actively used today. While all of the various ethical theories seek to lead one to be ethical, they differ on how this should be accomplished. Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses. It is important to understand these differences when analyzing ethical decisions from various perspectives.

For this Assignment, you are to add to the chart you constructed in Units 2, 3, and 5 by adding Ross’ prima facie duties and ethics of care. As with the other chart assignments, you will be providing the following for prima facie duties and ethics of care, using your own words:

How is “good” determined? Explain in one or two sentences what the theory argues is the correct way to determine what is right. This is the main argument of the theory in a nutshell.