Tag: Typographical errors

What would the 2020 candidates’ proposals mean for health care coverage?Does your argument for a policy address context and/or mechanisms that have been established by research to influence child outcomes?

Discuss why you believe this approach is most equitable. For example, what will it do to create health equity? Consider this in terms of access and affordability as well as the long-term impacts of healthcare for life trajectories. What inequities will this approach resolve?

Discuss the strengths and limitations/challenges of this approach and provide some ideas for how challenges could be addressed. For example, are challenges about public (mis) perceptions? If so, what can be done to overcome this?

Is evidence (research or policy-based evidence) presented to support your claim? Does your argument for a policy address context and/or mechanisms that have been established by research to influence child outcomes?

Is the writing concise and well organized? Is there a logical flow to the analysis? Is there a brief opening and conclusion? Have all instructions been followed?

Is the paper free of grammatical and/or typographical errors? Has it been adequately proofread?

Provide a unique “catchy” title at the top of the page in bold. This is your “heading” for the page.

Provide your name, ID, date of submission, course name and instructor on a cover page (see examples paper in Canvas under “resources”).

See https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/18/ for an example of how to set up your title page, headings, etc. (I have provided an example in Canvas in a module)

What would the 2020 candidates’ proposals mean for health care coverage? Brookings Institution overview of proposals suggested by 2020 political candidates. Summarizes the impact of proposed legislation by federal-level policymakers. https://www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/what-would-the-2020candidates-proposals-mean-for-health-care-co

Describe the role of your placement organisation in promotion of mental and physical wellbeing for the group identified in section 1 and reflect on your learning and placement experience.

Civil Dispute Resolution

Section 1 (49% FAIL): Discuss the issues facing a disadvantaged group in the UK. Outline the impact these issues have on health and wellbeing.

Describe any barriers to care and how these may be overcome You have discussed the issues facing a disadvantaged group in the UK and started to consider the impact on health and wellbeing.

However, there is only superficial description of the barriers to care and little suggestions as to how these barriers can be addressed.

The section on ESA is mostly reproduced from the gov.uk ESA website.

You need to consider how barriers can be overcome, rather than just reproducing information on the welfare system. Section 2 (49%, FAIL):

Define the role of the third sector in the UK in relation to health and wellbeing.

Using examples evaluate the role of the third sector in the UK in relation to the group identified in section 1

You have defined the role of the third sector and there is some consideration of the link between the third sector and the NHS/social care services.

However, the rest of this section is mostly descriptive regarding two third sector organisations.

There is little evaluation of the third sector and no links to the literature here.

Remember, in order to evaluate, you need to do more than just describe the achievements of an organisation. Section 3 (49%, FAIL):

Describe the role of your placement organisation in promotion of mental and physical wellbeing for the group identified in section 1 and reflect on your learning and placement experience.

You have described the role of your placement organisation in the promotion of health and wellbeing.

However, the personal reflection in this section is lacking.

You’ve said the experience was “life changing” but it is not clear how.

There are little considerations of implications for future practice.

You need to analyse your reflections and consider the learning from this placement.

You may find using a reflective framework such as Rolfe helpful here.

Section 4: General (49% FAIL): Spelling, grammar and referencing; adherence to word count.

Multiple typographical errors. Inconsistent use of capitalisation. Poor standard of referencing.

In one case, there is a directly copied sentence from an online source with no quotation marks or citation given. Errors in reference list formatting, especially with regards to authors of references